White line marking of tank locations
Installs crew not marking tank locations with white lines and taking a photo of it for starting
Reinforce requirement to white-line tank locations, capture photo and signed RAMS before works begin; enforce on-site checklist prior to excavation.
-
Install lead/project manager not fully reading/understanding method statement requirements and not following the documented marking/photo process.
Include explicit step in project workflows and engineer checklists; train install leads on rationale for marking and photographic evidence; monitor compliance via spot checks.
Actions assigned and training planned; monitoring required to confirm compliance over subsequent jobs.
Builds an evidence-based review from this NCL, status history, related NCLs, and relevant communications. The report is stored here and emailed to Luke, Rob and Michelle.
Use this panel for all status changes. Main edit form does not change status.
| From | To | Changed At | By | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In Review | In Review | 2026-06-01 08:59:51 | management review | Transcript summary: White-line marking of tank locations and photographic evidence: reminders issued and a handover sheet introduced; recent compliance has improved over the last couple of weeks. 2026-06-01: team confirmed reminders and handover sheet have improved recent compliance; ticket remains under review. Root cause check: partial - Behavioural reminders and a handover sheet have improved compliance but sustained change will need embedding into checklists and monitoring. |
| Initial | In Review | 2026-06-01 07:09:31 | management review | Transcript summary: Install crews (Daniel and Stephen) not marking tank locations or providing photo evidence and signed RAMS. Identified that method statement requires white-line marking and photographic evidence prior to works but process not consistently followed. Discussed at May 6 meeting; Luke/Rob to address inclusion in communication flows and reinforce process with install leads and Sophie. Root cause check: strong - Direct discussion established that the method statement contains the requirement but it is not being followed; multiple examples cited. |
| - | Initial | 2026-04-13 16:38:27 | anonymous | - |